Follow Us:
facebook

Latest research from the 2011 Family Business Survey

August 18th, 2011 | By Craig West

The latest annual survey prepared by FBA and KPMG has been released and has some interesting findings on Family Business and succession issues :
Just a little over 60% of all survey respondents highlighted retaining family control of the business is either a high or very high priority for them at the present time. Several other succession related issues also rated highly including preparing and training successors before succession actually takes place, selecting a successor, selecting family members for positions in the business and dealing with rivalry among potential successors in the family.

In terms of major reported causes of conflict in family businesses – future strategy, competence of family members working in the business and succession issues accounted for 44% of all reported conflict causes. Over 31% of respondents reported they had no formal mechanisms in place to resolve family business conflicts.

One area of considerable concern were the arrangements in place to manage the family/business interface – 65% of respondents said they had no succession plan for the CEO, 72% also said they had no succession plan for other senior positions held by family members and almost exactly half had no estate plan (wills ) for other family members with a stake in the business.
In terms of a possible exit strategy for the business a moderate number of respondents intended passing the business on to the next generation, interestingly this prospect became twice as likely in the long-term. Some form of sale of the business outside the family was the overwhelmingly popular exit strategy and implementation of any exit strategy at all was also three times more likely in the long term at 55% in the short term at just 16%.

Consideration of exit strategies Short term Medium term Long Term
(12 months ) ( 3 years ) 5+ years

Sale of business to a competitor/trade sale 50.5 42.0 33.5
Passing the business to the next generation 12.5 17.0 23.5
Appointment of a nonfamily CEO 12.0 11.5 10.0
Sale to a private equity consortium 9.0 8.5 7.5
Sale to current employees 7.5 8.5 10.0
Venture capital 3.0 4.5 4.0
Sale to another family member 3.0 5.5 6.0
Initial public offering (listing) 2.5 2.0 5.0
Other – 0.5 0.5

Commercialisation Australia chief Doron Ben-Meir: We want to fund more innovative SMEs

August 17th, 2011 | By Craig West

When Commercialisation Australia was launched in January last year, many entrepreneurs, frustrated by previous government-backed funding schemes such as Comet, were sceptical of its impact.
However, the organisation, which offers up to $2 million in matched funding to help start-ups’ skills, executive hires, commercialisation and proof of concept, is steadily building itself a favourable image among small businesses.

With more than $50 million dished out to innovative entrepreneurs since its creation, Commercialisation Australia still has cash to play with, after being given a $278 million war chest until 2014. It will get $82 million a year from then on.

Doron Ben-Meir was appointed CEO of Commercialisation Australia last April. He has personally founded several start-ups, as well as working for a number of leading VC firms, including a stint as CEO of Prescient Venture Capital.

StartupSmart spoke to Ben-Meir about the challenges faced by start-ups attempting to get government funding, as well as get his tips on how to land a grant

Click to read the full interview from Smart Company here

Grim short term outlook for SME’s – SMH 9th August

August 15th, 2011 | By Craig West

The global sharemarket rout is likely to have a heavy impact on SMEs.

Small enterprises should brace for even weaker trading conditions this quarter as the global sharemarket rout batters consumer confidence, hampers credit availability and threatens cash flow.

MySmallBusiness asked credit collection, insolvency and small business experts for their assessment of the rout’s effect on small and medium-size enterprises (SMEs), and for early warnings signs about likely business conditions.

The views were grim.

Colin Benjamin, chairman of Marshall Place Associates, and a prominent strategic planning consultant, believes small enterprises face four key threats.

“The key issue is the availability of credit. Many SMEs are desperately concerned that the banks are increasingly being bastards about calling in their loans as the global economy weakens,” he says.
“One business I know recently received a letter from a bank demanding their loan be repaid in seven days. I expect to see more of this as banks move to limit bad-debt risk and improve their funding liquidity.

“The second issue is companies putting off forward orders due to all this uncertainty. The factory order that is normally made in August is now being deferred until October. That has a huge flow-on effect through the supply chains as people delay production.”

Dr Benjamin says the third issue is more SMEs laying off casual staff because of concern about business conditions, regulatory uncertainty and the impact of unfair dismissal costs.

“The final SME issue is a sense that no one is out there to buy their business. Baby boomers exiting the workforce are finding it increasingly harder to sell their enterprise at a decent price,” he says.

Despite these threats, Benjamin is more optimistic about trading conditions in the fourth quarter and next year.

Ferrier Hodgson partner Morgan Kelly is not as optimistic. The insolvency expert says: “The SME sector continues to have trouble accessing credit and meeting credit standards, consumer demand is slowing, the regulatory framework is changing at a rate of knots with carbon tax and employment law reforms, and wage costs are increasing for many enterprises. There is not a lot of good news for SMEs right now.”

Kelly says another big problem is more small business owners holding off selling their business until conditions improve, and others being forced to sell because of succession issues.

“We are seeing more owners who are unable to sell, facing the very real possibility of having to walk away from their business with nothing.”

Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/small-business/finance/grim-shortterm-outlook-for-smes-20110809-1ik4u.html#ixzz1V3LShnkB

ESOP report: Record number of employers offering approved share schemes

August 9th, 2011 | By Craig West

A record 12,500 UK organisations operated at least one of the four tax-advantaged government share schemes last year, according to the Employee Share Ownership Centre’s (Esop) annual analysis of statistics from HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC).

The report, Employee share schemes statistics for 2009-10, published by HMRC on 30 June, showed that some of the four government-approved schemes, which include sharesave, share incentive plans (Sip), company share option plans (Csop), and enterprise management incentives (EMI), are in decline.

Of these schemes, only EMI fared better than the previous year. HMRC reported that 10,610 organisations operated an EMI scheme in 2009-10, an increase of 110 on 2008-09.

Malcolm Hurlston, chairman of Esop, said: “EMI is inexpensive to the public purse as, on the whole, if an organisation offering such a plan does well the extra tax revenue generated covers the relief given.

“The government can do more to promote the scheme with better liaison between the Treasury and business. It seemingly answers the coalition’s prayers as a cheap way to encourage growth in the [small and medium-sized enterprises] sector.”

The number of employees to whom options were granted under the all-employee sharesave increased by 120,000 staff, nearly 20%. This is despite 70 fewer organisations operating such a plan.

For a more valuable business you’ll need to hit these sweet spots: Part 2

August 5th, 2011 | By Linda Sirol

Part 2 – Big Ugly Risks

In Part 1 we looked at the fundamentals of a ‘high value’ business: less risk and more growth! So we understand that risks in the business impact on business valuation, but as we have a closer look at what these risks are, you’ll see that they also hold a business back from achieving its full potential. The risks in the business are typically those things that get in the way of execution of a strategic succession plan.

Reducing these risks is the first priority of Step 8 of our Strategic Advisory program which is all about Value Enhancement. When we have reduced the risks, the foundations of the business are right and ready for growth and succession.

Big Ugly Risks

1. Key Person Reliance: The ongoing operation of the business relies heavily on an individual; even worse is the situation where key people are the business owners who are looking to exit the business.

2. Management Mismatch: The skills and experience of the management team isn’t suited to the business direction (for growth), and there is nothing in place to assist management succession; this is especially the case where the business owner/s who are wishing to leave the business are also the only people on the company board and in key management roles.

3. Un-systemised: When business systems are not documented, are ineffective or unproven the business is usually inefficient, experiences losses and strained client relations due to poor quality work. Typically the management team and owners of un-systemised businesses complain about having to micro-manage and find it time consuming and expensive to train replacement staff.

4. Lack of Documentation: We realise that putting a plan in place doesn’t guarantee success in its own right, but it does help team alignment to common goals, and when external or internal changes trigger a change in business direction, the plan needs to be the blue print that is referred to and checked before deciding to switch horses. Other important documentation – for compliance and strategic reasons – includes key relationships (clients, suppliers and employees) and due-diligence documentation.

5. Generating Revenue is Costly or Time Consuming: A lack of repeat or referred business is a classic indicator of the revenue generation model being ill considered or ineffective; if there is a scatter gun approach to getting sales instead of a strategic approach, it will be costing the business dearly to get new business through the door. A heavy reliance on key customer/s is also a risk when it comes to reliability of future revenue.

6. Lack of Reporting: If a business can’t show a track record of reporting and forecasting across all areas of the business, then how on earth can it operate autonomously? Who is making decisions and on what basis? We know that ‘gut feel’ is a culmination of experience, and it often does result in good decision making, but this is a very risky basis for continuing to make decisions in a business if it is to be robust against industry, market or internal ‘surprises’, or if it is to achieve growth or ownership succession.

7. Poor Technology: Outdated or underutilised plant and equipment poses risks to business sustainability. It creates competitive vulnerability, and breeds complacency. Even if the business is doing well financially without striving for optimal efficiency and utilisation, it sure helps buffer against external changes (such as the GFC) if efficiency is a habit and valued in the business. Also relating to technology, ineffective intellectual property management presents risks and can undermine the value of a business, particularly where the intellectual property is one of the assets that give the business a competitive edge.

8. Sick Finances: Personal finances mixed with business may bring short term gains in personal wealth, but these can come at a much higher long term cost. Remember that if you’re looking the sell the business or have it valued for any reason, each dollar that’s missing from the bottom line can be worth many times more dollars when it comes time to value the business. In terms of reliability of future revenue, basic business sustainability and capacity to finance growth, other risks are inconsistent cash flow, poor or inconsistent profit margins, and carrying unprofitable products/services.

So now we understand what the Big Ugly Risks are, what are the Gorgeous Growth Attributes? Keep an eye out for my next blog, and I’ll share these with you.